Modernise with perspective
Understand which parts of an established system need to change, which can be retained, and how the pieces depend on one another.
System Audits
A clear view.
A confident next decision.
Before committing to a replatform, migration, or build-versus-buy decision, get an independent view of your systems. We examine constraints, compare options, and produce a prioritised plan your leadership and engineering teams can act on.
Where this fits
Before the next commitment.
Choose the right direction
Compare a new build, a vendor product, or an extension to your existing platform against your actual requirements.
Resolve a system constraint
Examine reliability, integration, data flows, or delivery friction that is limiting the next stage of work.
What you receive
Findings your team
can act on.
The review connects technical evidence with business priorities. The agreed scope determines the depth and format of each deliverable.
Current architecture and dependencies
A shared map of the systems, interfaces, data flows, and responsibilities relevant to your decision.
Risks and constraints
Prioritised findings with the supporting evidence, operational implications, and questions that still need to be resolved.
Options and decision records
Practical alternatives, their trade-offs, and a recommendation with explicit assumptions.
An actionable next phase
A sequence of changes and validation steps, discussed with the people who will own the work.
How we work together
Evidence before commitment.
- 01
Frame
Agree the decision, scope, success criteria, and people who need to be involved.
- 02
Examine
Review relevant documentation, code, interfaces, and operating evidence alongside your team.
- 03
Evaluate
Compare options and test the assumptions that materially affect the recommendation.
- 04
Align
Walk through the findings, record the decision, and agree priorities for the next phase.
Before we begin
Useful details.
Clear expectations.
Do we need complete documentation?
No. Existing diagrams and documents are a useful starting point, but a review can also draw on interviews, repositories, interfaces, and operational evidence. Access and expectations are agreed before work starts.
How much access will you need?
It depends on the question. We agree the minimum information and access needed for the review, taking account of your confidentiality and security processes.
Is this a security or compliance certification?
This service reviews software and architecture within an agreed technical scope. Penetration testing, formal certification, legal review, and regulatory opinions require their own specialist scope.
Does an audit commit us to implementation?
No. The findings are intended to support your decision and your team’s next steps. Any implementation engagement is agreed separately.
How are duration and fees agreed?
The proposal reflects the number of systems, depth of investigation, dependencies, and availability of the people involved. Scope, timing, and commercial terms are agreed before the review begins.
Start a conversation
Which decision
needs a clearer view?
Tell us about the system, the decision ahead, and any constraints that matter. We’ll use that context to shape a useful first conversation.
hello@intervencija.eu